The Clarity Team
Eleven AI agents named after history's greatest minds, each bringing a distinct method to the discovery process.
From framework design through to verified findings, our agents follow the stages of scientific inquiry: observation, pattern recognition, classification, synthesis, and falsification.
The Discovery Pipeline
Galilei — Orchestrator
Coordinates Ask AI queries across all agents after analysis
Design
Framework creation
Discovery
Interview execution
Analysis
Pattern & org analysis
Synthesis
Executive narrative
Validation
Research & verification
Presentation
Visualisation & Board Read
Galilei — Orchestrator
Coordinates Ask AI across all agents
Design
Framework creation
Discovery
Interview execution
Analysis
Pattern & org analysis
Synthesis
Executive narrative
Validation
Research & verification
Presentation
Visualisation & Board Read
Meet the Team
Each agent is named after a scientist whose work embodies their analytical method. Click the link icon to learn more about their namesake.
Method
Empirical method design
Purpose
Designs discovery frameworks that ensure synthesis-readiness. Collaborates with consultants to define sections, seed questions, probes, and capture targets before interviews begin.
Hand-off
Delivers a validated framework to Socrates for interview execution.
Method
Socratic questioning
Purpose
Conducts discovery interviews using the Socratic method. Uncovers truth through thoughtful, probing questions that help participants articulate insights they hadn't considered.
Hand-off
Passes interview transcripts to Humboldt for analysis.
Method
Systematic observation
Purpose
Orchestrates the analysis pipeline, routing questions to the right expert and coordinating the flow between agents during the explore phase.
Hand-off
Routes queries to appropriate specialists and synthesises their responses.
Method
Holistic observation
Purpose
Analyses each interview transcript with fresh eyes, extracting data points, quantifications, quotable quotes, and risk flags without preconception.
Hand-off
Passes structured interview extracts to Bayes for pattern detection.
Method
Probabilistic reasoning
Purpose
Detects patterns across all interviews: frequency patterns, correlations, outliers, and notably absent topics. Maps findings to framework sections.
Hand-off
Passes pattern analysis to Linnaeus for organisational context.
Method
Systematic classification
Purpose
Reveals how the organisation actually works: structures, relationships, power flows, cultural patterns, perception gaps, and change readiness.
Hand-off
Passes organisational analysis to Darwin for synthesis.
Method
Integrative synthesis
Purpose
Weaves patterns, observations, and organisational insights into a coherent executive narrative with critical findings, recommendations, and evidence gaps.
Hand-off
Passes synthesis to Curie for external validation.
Method
External validation
Purpose
Tests claims against external sources, including industry benchmarks, research, best practices, and case studies. Grounds conclusions in evidence.
Hand-off
Passes research findings to Popper for verification.
Method
Adversarial review
Purpose
Challenges the synthesis by flagging unsupported claims, overstatements, fabricated specifics, and potential hallucinations. Quality assurance, not gatekeeping.
Hand-off
Delivers verified, confidence-rated findings to Nightingale and Follett.
Method
Visual storytelling
Purpose
Transforms complex analysis into clear, compelling visualisations. Creates energy maps, tension diagrams, and confidence dashboards that make patterns immediately visible to executives.
Hand-off
Provides visual narratives to Follett for the Board Read.
Method
Decision compression
Purpose
Transforms validated analysis into a board-level narrative. Applies editorial judgement to select what matters, integrate tensions, and enable coordinated action through clear, authoritative writing.
Hand-off
Delivers the Board Read—a complete executive document ready for leadership.
Why Scientists?
We named our agents after scientists whose methods mirror their analytical approach. Bayes detects patterns through probabilistic reasoning. Darwin synthesises vast observations into coherent theory. Popper challenges assumptions through falsification.
This isn't just branding; it's a commitment to rigour. Each agent embodies the intellectual tradition of their namesake, bringing centuries of methodological wisdom to modern discovery.